State v. Ellis
Court of Criminal Appeals of Alabama
1DissentWelch, Judge
I respectfully dissent. For the reasons that follow, I would affirm.
“ ‘Temporary detention of individuals during the stop of an automobile by the police, even if only for a brief period and for a limited purpose, constitutes a “seizure” of “persons” within the meaning of the [Fourth Amendment].’ ” Brown v. State, 821 So.2d 219, 223 (quoting, Whren v. United States, 517 U.S. 806, 809-10, 116 S.Ct. 1769, 135 L.Ed.2d 89 (1996) (citations omitted)). The majority concludes that because Cpl. Richerson determined that Ellis was not intoxicated and, thus, not arrested on charges of driving while…
2Cases cited9 opinions
- Terry v. OhioSupreme Court of the United States · 1968
- Whren v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1996
- Dale E. Kraus and Rosetta M. Kraus, Husband and Wife Cindy D. Kraus, Individually and Todd W. Montgomery, Individually v. County of PierceCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1986
- Eddie Lee Jefferson v. Ronald FountainCourt of Appeals for the Eleventh Circuit · 2004
- Ex Parte PeraitaSupreme Court of Alabama · 2004
4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.