Legal Opinion

Washington v. Washington

Supreme Court of South Carolina

Decided July 13, 1992No. 23683PublishedCited by 1 opinion

1Opinion of the Court

Moore, Justice:

*550This is an appeal from an order of the family court granting a decree of separate maintenance, equitable distribution, rehabilitative alimony and child support. The issue is whether the family court erred in allowing Husband to proceed pro se. We affirm.

FACTS

This action was initialed by appellant (Husband), who sought an order declaring that he and respondent (Wife) were living separate and apart, and granted equitable distribution of the marital property. Wife counterclaimed, seeking alimony and child support in addition to a separation decree and equitable distribution.…

2Cases cited3 opinions

  1. Lassiter v. Department of Social Servs. of Durham Cty.Supreme Court of the United States · 1981
  2. Hoffman Ex Rel. Estate of Hoffman v. PowellSupreme Court of South Carolina · 1989
  3. South Carolina Department of Social Services v. VanderhorstSupreme Court of South Carolina · 1986

3Cited by1 opinion

  1. Washington v. WashingtonSupreme Court of South Carolina · 1992

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API