Legal Opinion

Fitts v. Eberlin

District Court, N.D. Ohio

Decided April 17, 2009No. Case 5:08CV660PublishedCited by 4 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

MEMORANDUM OPINION AND ORDER

SARA LIOI, District Judge.

This Memorandum Opinion and Order arises out of the objections (Doc. No. 21) filed by Petitioner Anthony Lamar Fitts (“Fitts”) to the Report and Recommendation of Magistrate Judge William Baughman, Jr., recommending that this Court dismiss Fitts’s petition for writ of habeas corpus as time-barred (Doc. No. 20). For the reasons that follow, the Court ACCEPTS the Report and Recommendation and DISMISSES Fitts’s petition for writ of habeas corpus.

I. FACTUAL AND PROCEDURAL HISTORY

In his objections, Fitts acknowledged that, with the exception of…

2Cases cited32 opinions

  1. Thomas v. ArnSupreme Court of the United States · 1986
  2. Schlup v. DeloSupreme Court of the United States · 1995
  3. United States v. W. R. Walters, United States of America v. Two Hundred Sixty-Two FirearmsCourt of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · 1981
  4. Houston v. LackSupreme Court of the United States · 1988
  5. Bousley v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1998

27 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by4 opinions

  1. Mark Allen Jenkins v. State of Alabama.Court of Criminal Appeals of Alabama · 2011
  2. Clemons v. StateCourt of Criminal Appeals of Alabama · 2012
  3. Lee v. StateCourt of Criminal Appeals of Alabama · 2017
  4. Moss v. ChristansenDistrict Court, E.D. Michigan · 2025

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API