Legal Opinion

Leines v. Homeland Vinyl Products, Inc.

District Court, E.D. California

Decided January 24, 2020No. 2:18-cv-00969Unknown

1Opinion

1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT 9 FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 10 11 RICHARD A. LEINES, No. 2:18-cv-00969-KJM-DB 12 Plaintiff, 13 v. ORDER 14 HOMELAND VINYL PRODUCTS, INC., 15 Defendant. 16 17 Plaintiff Richard Leines sues defendant Homeland Vinyl, Inc. (“Homeland”), 18 alleging, among other things, Homeland’s “Gorilla Lock” product infringes a patent owned and 19 developed by Leines. On September 30, 2019, the court conducted a claim construction hearing in 20 accordance with Markman v. Westview Instruments, Inc.,

517 U.S. 370

(1996). Through this order, 21 based on the…

2Cases cited14 opinions

  1. MARKMAN Et Al. v. WESTVIEW INSTRUMENTS, INC., Et Al.Supreme Court of the United States · 1996
  2. Edward H. Phillips v. Awh Corporation, Hopeman Brothers, Inc., and Lofton Corporation, Defendants-CrossCourt of Appeals for the Federal Circuit · 2006
  3. Herbert Markman and Positek, Inc. v. Westview Instruments, Inc. And Althon Enterprises, Inc.Court of Appeals for the Federal Circuit · 1995
  4. Nautilus, Inc. v. Biosig Instruments, Inc.Supreme Court of the United States · 2014
  5. Innova/pure Water, Inc. v. Safari Water Filtration Systems, Inc. (Doing Business as Safari Outdoor Products)Court of Appeals for the Federal Circuit · 2004

9 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API