Shireman v. Null

Opinion of the Court by

Judge Rees

Reversing,

This case involves the location of a property line between a 68-acre tract of land owned by appellants and a 54%-acre tract owned by the appellee Fluorspar Consolidated, Inc., on which the appellee William Null has-a mineral lease. Counsel for appellees admit that the statements in brief for appellants concerning the description of the property in dispute is correct, and we shall adopt the substance of these statements.

The appellants own a tract of land in Crittenden. County which is known as the Hickory Cane mining; property, and the appellee…