Legal Opinion
Murphy v. Secretary of Health and Human Services
United States Court of Federal Claims
Decided August 15, 2016No. 05-1063PublishedCited by 11 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
National Childhood Vaccine Injury Act (“Vaccine Act”), 42 U.S.C. § 300aa-1 to -34 (2012); Vaccine Rule 23; Diphtheria-Tetanus-Acellular Pertussis Vaccine; Measles, Mumps And Rubella Vaccine.
MEMORANDUM OPINION AND ORDER
GRIGGSBY, Judge
I. INTRODUCTION
Petitioners, John A Murphy and Barbara E. Murphy, parents of M.M., a minor child, seek review of the April 25, 2016, decision of the special master denying their claim for compensation under the National Childhood Vaccine Injury Act (“Vaccine Act”), 42 U.S.C. § 800aa-l to -34 (2012). Petitioners allege that their minor child suffered an…
2Cases cited16 opinions
- United States v. United States Gypsum Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1948
- Althen v. Secretary of Health and Human ServicesCourt of Appeals for the Federal Circuit · 2005
- Moberly v. Secretary of Health & Human ServicesCourt of Appeals for the Federal Circuit · 2010
- Andreu Ex Rel. Andreu v. Secretary of Health and Human ServicesCourt of Appeals for the Federal Circuit · 2009
- Rose Capizzano v. Secretary of Health and Human ServicesCourt of Appeals for the Federal Circuit · 2006
11 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by11 opinions
- Austin v. Secretary of Health and Human ServicesUnited States Court of Federal Claims · 2018
- Dempsey v. Secretary of Health and Human ServicesUnited States Court of Federal Claims · 2017
- HAZLEHURST v. SECRETARY OF HEALTH AND HUMAN SERVICESUnited States Court of Federal Claims · 2025
- Hooker v. Secretary of Health and Human ServicesUnited States Court of Federal Claims · 2017
- Loyd v. Secretary of Health and Human ServicesUnited States Court of Federal Claims · 2021
6 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.