Legal Opinion
Amato v. Randolph Tp. Planning Bd.
New Jersey Superior Court Appellate Division
Decided December 16, 1982PublishedCited by 18 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
188 N.J. Super. 439 (1982)
457 A.2d 1188
PHILIP AMATO AND DONNA AMATO, HUSBAND AND WIFE, PLAINTIFFS-RESPONDENTS,
v.
RANDOLPH TOWNSHIP PLANNING BOARD AND RANDOLPH TOWNSHIP ZONING BOARD OF ADJUSTMENT, DEFENDANTS-APPELLANTS.
Superior Court of New Jersey, Appellate Division.
Argued November 23, 1982.
Decided December 16, 1982.
Before Judges MICHELS, PRESSLER and TRAUTWEIN.
Herbert M. Strulowitz argued the cause for the appellants.
Roy E. Kurnos argued the cause for the respondents.
The opinion of the court was delivered by PRESSLER, J.A.D.
This action in lieu of prerogative writs implicates heretofore…
2Cases cited6 opinions
- Divan Builders v. Planning Bd. Tp. of WayneSupreme Court of New Jersey · 1975
- St. Vincent's Hospital v. FinleyNew Jersey Superior Court Appellate Division · 1977
- In Re Application of Union Community BankNew Jersey Superior Court Appellate Division · 1976
- Pitts v. NJ Racing Comm'nNew Jersey Superior Court Appellate Division · 1982
- Lakeland Parks, Inc. v. Washington TownshipNew Jersey Superior Court Appellate Division · 1977
1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by18 opinions
- El Shaer v. PLANNING BD. OF TP. OF LAWRENCENew Jersey Superior Court Appellate Division · 1991
- Smith v. Fair Haven Zoning Bd. of AdjustmentNew Jersey Superior Court Appellate Division · 2000
- D.I.A.L v. City of Clifton Construction Board of AppealsNew Jersey Superior Court Appellate Division · 1987
- In Re HawleyNew Jersey Superior Court Appellate Division · 1983
- Paramus Multiplex Corp. v. Hartz Mtn. Ind., Inc.New Jersey Superior Court Appellate Division · 1989
13 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.