State v. Monsebroten
Court of Appeals of Oregon
1Opinion of the CourtDe Muniz, J.
Defendant appeals his conviction for rape in the first degree. ORS 163.375. His first trial ended in a mistrial, but he was convicted in a second trial. He contends that the trial court erred when it denied his motion for a continuance, refused to allow him to use the prior transcribed testimony of a witness who failed to appear at his retrial, failed to order a mistrial because of a comment made by the prosecutor in his closing argument and refused to give defendant’s requested jury instruction on the credibility of the victim. We affirm.
Defendant called Davis as a witness at the first…
2Cases cited7 opinions
- State v. LundbomCourt of Appeals of Oregon · 1989
- State v. OttenOregon Supreme Court · 1963
- State v. LantzCourt of Appeals of Oregon · 1980
- State v. BashawOregon Supreme Court · 1983
- State v. HowardCourt of Appeals of Oregon · 1980
2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by5 opinions
- State v. PurrierCourt of Appeals of Oregon · 2014
- State v. LogstonCourt of Appeals of Oregon · 2015
- State v. BrannanCourt of Appeals of Oregon · 2024
- State v. HewittCourt of Appeals of Oregon · 1999
- State v. HewittCourt of Appeals of Oregon · 1999