Legal Opinion

State v. Monsebroten

Court of Appeals of Oregon

Decided April 24, 1991No. 87-1130; CA A61663PublishedCited by 5 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtDe Muniz, J.

Defendant appeals his conviction for rape in the first degree. ORS 163.375. His first trial ended in a mistrial, but he was convicted in a second trial. He contends that the trial court erred when it denied his motion for a continuance, refused to allow him to use the prior transcribed testimony of a witness who failed to appear at his retrial, failed to order a mistrial because of a comment made by the prosecutor in his closing argument and refused to give defendant’s requested jury instruction on the credibility of the victim. We affirm.

Defendant called Davis as a witness at the first…

2Cases cited7 opinions

  1. State v. LundbomCourt of Appeals of Oregon · 1989
  2. State v. OttenOregon Supreme Court · 1963
  3. State v. LantzCourt of Appeals of Oregon · 1980
  4. State v. BashawOregon Supreme Court · 1983
  5. State v. HowardCourt of Appeals of Oregon · 1980

2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by5 opinions

  1. State v. PurrierCourt of Appeals of Oregon · 2014
  2. State v. LogstonCourt of Appeals of Oregon · 2015
  3. State v. BrannanCourt of Appeals of Oregon · 2024
  4. State v. HewittCourt of Appeals of Oregon · 1999
  5. State v. HewittCourt of Appeals of Oregon · 1999

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API