Mullin v. John Hancock Mutual Life Insurance
Massachusetts Superior Court
1Opinion of the CourtButler, J.
Robert E. Mullin brought this claim pursuant to the Employment Retirement Income Security Act (ERISA), 29 U.S.C. §1132(a)(1)(B), to recover benefits under the terms of an insurance plan (plan) issued by John Hancock Mutual Life Insurance Company (Hancock) to Wang Laboratories, Inc. (Wang). Mullin is seeking judgment that he is and has been totally or partially disabled under the terms of the plan since October 12, 1988. Hancock has moved that the appropriate standard to review Hancock’s denial of benefits under the plan is an abuse of discretion review. Mullin argues that a de novo standard…
2Cases cited18 opinions
- Firestone Tire & Rubber Co. v. BruchSupreme Court of the United States · 1989
- Curtis v. LoetherSupreme Court of the United States · 1974
- Fred Brown v. Blue Cross and Blue Shield of Alabama, Inc.Court of Appeals for the Eleventh Circuit · 1990
- Claude Wardle, Sr. v. Central States, Southeast and Southwest Areas Pension FundCourt of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit · 1980
- Olan Jett v. Blue Cross and Blue Shield of Alabama, Inc., Medical Expense PlanCourt of Appeals for the Eleventh Circuit · 1989
13 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.