Theros v. Metropolitan Life Insurance Company
Utah Supreme Court
1DissentCrockett, Justice
This is a summary judgment, and speaking generally about it, should be regarded as a stringent measure which deprives the plaintiff of an opportunity of presenting her case for trial by a court or a jury. Accordingly, it should be granted with reluctance and only when, taking the facts shown and all fair inferences to be drawn therefrom in the light most favorable to her, she could not establish a right to recover; and unless it clearly so appears, doubts should be resolved in favor of permitting her to go to trial.1
Speaking specifically about this case there are some other fundamentals which…
2Cases cited9 opinions
- Mockowik v. Kansas CitySupreme Court of Missouri · 1906
- Miller v. CommonwealthSupreme Court of Virginia · 1939
- Morris v. Farnsworth MotelUtah Supreme Court · 1953
- Tangren v. IngallsUtah Supreme Court · 1961
- Boyle v. BaggsUtah Supreme Court · 1960
4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.