Legal Opinion

Bates v. Drainage Commissioners

Appellate Court of Illinois

Decided January 12, 1934No. Gen. No. 8,781PublishedCited by 2 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtJustice Fulton

Appellant filed an action in case against appellee. The declaration consisting of a single count claimed damages for the negligent burning and destroying of appellant’s property in the maintenance of the drainage district ditch. Appellee filed a plea of not guilty and a trial was had before a jury. At the close of appellant’s proof the court, on motion of appellee, directed a verdict in favor of the drainage district, which was returned by the jury. Appellant’s motion for a new trial was overruled and judgment was entered against him in bar of the action and for costs. The facts are not…

2Cases cited7 opinions

  1. City of Chicago v. SebenIllinois Supreme Court · 1897
  2. Elmore v. Drainage CommissionersIllinois Supreme Court · 1890
  3. Bradbury v. Vandalia Levee & Drainage DistrictIllinois Supreme Court · 1908
  4. Johnston v. City of ChicagoIllinois Supreme Court · 1913
  5. Commissioners of Union Drainage District No. 3 v. Commissioners of Highways of Township 40Illinois Supreme Court · 1906

2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by2 opinions

  1. Eeingenburg v. Lincoln-Lansing Drainage DistrictAppellate Court of Illinois · 1941
  2. Ætna Casualty & Surety Co. v. Kishwaukee Special Drainage Dist.Court of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit · 1944

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API