Legal Opinion

Yokoyama v. San Carlos Operating Co.

City of New York Municipal Court

Decided September 15, 1932Published

1Opinion of the Court

Lewis, David C., J.

The complaint lists two causes of action. The defendant treats them as sounding in trover and the plaintiff apparently acquiesces in this deduction. The defendant moves for the dismissal of the complaint on the ground that it appears on the face of the complaint that it does not state facts sufficient to constitute a cause of action. The plaintiff submits neither argument nor authorities in support of his complaint, content to let the document speak for itself.

The complaint is composed of substantially the following facts: That the plaintiff on about February 15, 1932, duly…

2Cases cited9 opinions

  1. McCoy v. American Express Co.New York Court of Appeals · 1930
  2. Salt Springs National Bank v. . WheelerNew York Court of Appeals · 1872
  3. Howland v. . WillettsNew York Court of Appeals · 1853
  4. Scott v. . MorganNew York Court of Appeals · 1884
  5. Dickinson v. . OliverNew York Court of Appeals · 1909

4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API