Legal Opinion
Village Apartment Homes, Inc. v. Bowles
Emergency Court of Appeals
Decided May 18, 1945No. Nos. 104, 173PublishedCited by 2 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
LAWS, Judge.
Claim is made in this case by an owner of apartment houses that adjustments of rents under provisions of the Rent Regulation for Housing should be granted, and the alternative claim is made that, if the adjustments are not granted, the Regulation is invalid.1
Complainant owns two apartment projects in the Minneapolis-St. Paul Defense-Rental Area. One, known as Fair Oaks Apartments, consists of 224 apartments; the other, known as Highland Village, consists of 265 apartments. The projects, which were opened for occupancy during 1939 and the first six months of 1940, were financed…
2Cases cited7 opinions
- Lakemore Co. v. BrownEmergency Court of Appeals · 1943
- Madison Park Corporation v. BowlesEmergency Court of Appeals · 1943
- Hillcrest Terrace Corporation v. BrownEmergency Court of Appeals · 1943
- Northwood Apartments, Inc. v. BrownEmergency Court of Appeals · 1943
- Bibb Mfg. Co. v. BowlesEmergency Court of Appeals · 1944
2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by2 opinions
- Fleming v. TaylorDistrict Court, N.D. Texas · 1947
- Porter v. HillsDistrict Court, D. Kansas · 1946