Legal Opinion
In Re Farnkopf
New Jersey Superior Court Appellate Division
Decided October 22, 2003PublishedCited by 15 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
833 A.2d 89 (2003)
363 N.J. Super. 382
In the Matter of Allen M. FARNKOPF, Alleged to be in need of Protective Services.
Superior Court of New Jersey, Appellate Division.
Submitted September 9, 2003.
Decided October 22, 2003.
Andrea Rhea, Pennsville, attorney for appellant Salem County Office on Aging.
Respondents have not filed briefs.
Before Judges SKILLMAN, WELLS and FISHER.
The opinion of the court was delivered by FISHER, J.A.D.
The Adult Protective Services Act (the Act)[1] authorizes protective services providers, such as appellant Salem County Office on Aging, to pursue legal relief for the…
2Cases cited20 opinions
- Packard-Bamberger & Co., Inc. v. CollierSupreme Court of New Jersey · 2001
- Curtis v. FinneranSupreme Court of New Jersey · 1980
- North Bergen Rex Transport, Inc. v. Trailer Leasing Co.Supreme Court of New Jersey · 1999
- McKeown-Brand v. Trump Castle Hotel & CasinoSupreme Court of New Jersey · 1993
- Saffer v. WilloughbySupreme Court of New Jersey · 1996
15 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by15 opinions
- In Re Probate of Will and Codicil of MacOolNew Jersey Superior Court Appellate Division · 2010
- Grubbs v. KnollNew Jersey Superior Court Appellate Division · 2005
- Liberty Mut. v. Garden State Surg.New Jersey Superior Court Appellate Division · 2010
- New Jersey Realty Concepts, LLC v. John MavroudisNew Jersey Superior Court Appellate Division · 2014
- In re the Guardianship of MacakNew Jersey Superior Court Appellate Division · 2005
10 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.