Commonwealth v. Ortiz
Superior Court of Pennsylvania
1Opinion of the Court
BECK, Judge.
We address the definition of the phrase, “place of abode,” as used in criminal statute, Firearms Not to be Carried Without a License, 18 Pa.C.S. § 6106(a).1
The Commonwealth of Pennsylvania appeals from an order granting defendant-ap-pellee habeas corpus relief by dismissing the count in the information charging appellee with carrying a firearm without a license, in violation of 18 Pa.C.S. § 6106(a).
Because 18 Pa.C.S. § 6106(a) excepts from culpability a person who possesses an unlicensed firearm in his or her “place of abode,” the issue before us is whether the rear, fenced-in…
2Cases cited4 opinions
- Commonwealth v. LopezSuperior Court of Pennsylvania · 1995
- Commonwealth v. KarlsonSuperior Court of Pennsylvania · 1996
- Commonwealth v. SaundersSuperior Court of Pennsylvania · 1997
- Commonwealth v. LopezSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1989
3Cited by2 opinions
- Commonwealth v. McMullenSuperior Court of Pennsylvania · 1998
- Commonwealth v. OrtizSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1999