Legal Opinion

Commonwealth v. Ortiz

Superior Court of Pennsylvania

Decided November 24, 1997No. 03483PublishedCited by 2 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

BECK, Judge.

We address the definition of the phrase, “place of abode,” as used in criminal statute, Firearms Not to be Carried Without a License, 18 Pa.C.S. § 6106(a).1

The Commonwealth of Pennsylvania appeals from an order granting defendant-ap-pellee habeas corpus relief by dismissing the count in the information charging appellee with carrying a firearm without a license, in violation of 18 Pa.C.S. § 6106(a).

Because 18 Pa.C.S. § 6106(a) excepts from culpability a person who possesses an unlicensed firearm in his or her “place of abode,” the issue before us is whether the rear, fenced-in…

2Cases cited4 opinions

  1. Commonwealth v. LopezSuperior Court of Pennsylvania · 1995
  2. Commonwealth v. KarlsonSuperior Court of Pennsylvania · 1996
  3. Commonwealth v. SaundersSuperior Court of Pennsylvania · 1997
  4. Commonwealth v. LopezSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1989

3Cited by2 opinions

  1. Commonwealth v. McMullenSuperior Court of Pennsylvania · 1998
  2. Commonwealth v. OrtizSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1999

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API