Legal Opinion

Commerce Insurance Co., Inc. v. Gentile

Massachusetts Supreme Judicial Court

Decided September 16, 2015No. SJC 11706PublishedCited by 5 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

This case concerns the obligation of Commerce Insurance Company (Commerce) to pay optional bodily injury benefits under a standard Massachusetts automobile insurance policy. The defendants Vittorio and Lydia Gentile (Gentiles) were the policyholders, and their grandson Vittorio Gentile, Jr. (Junior), was an “excluded operator” under the policy. While operating one of the Gentiles’ vehicles covered by the policy, Junior caused an accident that seriously injured Douglas and Joseph Homsi (Homsis). 2 , 3 Commerce sought a judgment declaring that the Gentiles’ violation of the operator exclusion…

2Cases cited6 opinions

  1. Hanover Insurance v. LeedsMassachusetts Appeals Court · 1997
  2. Barnstable County Insurance v. GaleMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1997
  3. Epstein v. Northwestern National InsuranceMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1929
  4. Chenard v. Commerce InsuranceMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 2003
  5. Heinrich-Grundy v. Allstate InsuranceMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1988

1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by5 opinions

  1. IDS Prop. Casualty Ins. Co. v. Government Employees Ins. Co.Court of Appeals for the First Circuit · 2021
  2. Atlantic Specialty Insurance Company v. Karl's Boat Shop, Inc.District Court, D. Massachusetts · 2020
  3. Metro. Prop. & Cas. Ins. Co. v. DevlinDistrict Court, District of Columbia · 2018
  4. Metropolitan Property and Casualty Insurance Company v. DevlinDistrict Court, D. Massachusetts · 2018
  5. Schultz v. TilleyMassachusetts Appeals Court · 2017

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API