Crestar Bank v. Martin
Supreme Court of Virginia
1Opinion of the CourtChief Justice Carrico
The question for decision in this case involving mobile homes is whether a family subdivision which is exempt from compliance with a subdivision ordinance is nevertheless subject to the land-use controls of a zoning ordinance.
At the time of the proceeding below, Section 16-2 of the Montgomery County subdivision ordinance1 defined a subdivision as “the division of a parcel of land into three (3) or more lots or parcels, any of which is less than five (5) acres each, ... for the *234purpose of transfer of ownership or building development,” Section 16-16 (a) provided that no person shall subdivide…
2Cases cited5 opinions
- Segaloff v. City of Newport NewsSupreme Court of Virginia · 1968
- Hladys v. CommonwealthSupreme Court of Virginia · 1988
- Hurt v. CaldwellSupreme Court of Virginia · 1981
- Leake v. CasatiSupreme Court of Virginia · 1988
- Town of Blacksburg v. PriceSupreme Court of Virginia · 1980
3Cited by2 opinions
- Wolfe v. Board of Zoning AppealsSupreme Court of Virginia · 2000
- Harvest Christian Center v. Zoning Appeals BoardKing George County Circuit Court · 2001