Legal Opinion

Crestar Bank v. Martin

Supreme Court of Virginia

Decided September 22, 1989No. Record No. 881074PublishedCited by 2 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtChief Justice Carrico

The question for decision in this case involving mobile homes is whether a family subdivision which is exempt from compliance with a subdivision ordinance is nevertheless subject to the land-use controls of a zoning ordinance.

At the time of the proceeding below, Section 16-2 of the Montgomery County subdivision ordinance1 defined a subdivision as “the division of a parcel of land into three (3) or more lots or parcels, any of which is less than five (5) acres each, ... for the *234purpose of transfer of ownership or building development,” Section 16-16 (a) provided that no person shall subdivide…

2Cases cited5 opinions

  1. Segaloff v. City of Newport NewsSupreme Court of Virginia · 1968
  2. Hladys v. CommonwealthSupreme Court of Virginia · 1988
  3. Hurt v. CaldwellSupreme Court of Virginia · 1981
  4. Leake v. CasatiSupreme Court of Virginia · 1988
  5. Town of Blacksburg v. PriceSupreme Court of Virginia · 1980

3Cited by2 opinions

  1. Wolfe v. Board of Zoning AppealsSupreme Court of Virginia · 2000
  2. Harvest Christian Center v. Zoning Appeals BoardKing George County Circuit Court · 2001

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API