Legal Opinion

City of New Orleans v. Elms

Louisiana Court of Appeal

Decided March 14, 1989No. 88-CA-0824PublishedCited by 2 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

ARMSTRONG, Judge.

Plaintiff, the City of New Orleans (the “City”), and intervenors, the St. Charles Avenue and Garden District Associations, appeal from a judgment in favor of defendants, John J. Elms, Jr., Joyce Elms Ben-chabbat, and Jacques Benchabbat, maintaining defendants’ exception of prescription and dismissing plaintiff and inter-venors’ suits to enjoin defendants from operating a party and reception business in a residence located at 3029 St. Charles Avenue in the City of New Orleans.

This case is before us for the second time. The City originally instituted this action in November,…

2Cases cited9 opinions

  1. Redfearn v. CreppelSupreme Court of Louisiana · 1984
  2. City of West Monroe v. OUACHITA ASS'N, ETC.Louisiana Court of Appeal · 1981
  3. Benelli v. City of New OrleansLouisiana Court of Appeal · 1985
  4. Lawson v. Continental Southern Lines, Inc.Louisiana Court of Appeal · 1965
  5. Parish of Jefferson v. GroetschLouisiana Court of Appeal · 1972

4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by2 opinions

  1. City of New Orleans v. ElmsSupreme Court of Louisiana · 1990
  2. City of New Orleans v. ElmsSupreme Court of Louisiana · 1989

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API