Legal Opinion

Demetrice Armicle McNeal v. State of Florida

Supreme Court of Florida

Decided June 5, 2014No. SC13-650PublishedCited by 1 opinion

1Opinion of the CourtQuince, J.

We have for review McNeal v. State, 109 So.3d 268, 271 (Fla. 1st DCA 2013), in which the First District Court of Appeal found that satisfying the foundational requirements under the past recollection recorded exception to hearsay need not come from the declarant’s testimony. 1 At the time that the First District issued its decision below, Polite v. State, 41 So.3d 935 (Fla. 5th DCA 2010), quashed, 116 So.3d 270 (Fla.2013), was pending review in this Court. We have jurisdiction. See art. V, § 3(b)(3), Fla. Const.

We stayed proceedings in this case pending disposition of Polite, in which we held…

2Cases cited4 opinions

  1. State v. DiGuilioSupreme Court of Florida · 1986
  2. Polite v. StateSupreme Court of Florida · 2013
  3. Polite v. StateDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida · 2010
  4. McNeal v. StateDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida · 2013

3Cited by1 opinion

  1. McNeal v. StateDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida · 2014

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API