Legal Opinion

Efner v. Ketteringham

Louisiana Court of Appeal

Decided February 21, 1949No. 7306PublishedCited by 4 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

The residence properties of plaintiff and the defendants adjoin and front on Prospect Street in the City of Shreveport, Louisiana, that of plaintiff being west of defendants'. Plaintiff's property is designated as Municipal No. 811 and defendants' as No. 805 on Prospect Street, and will be hereinafter so designated.

For several years prior to 1914, plaintiff owned the ground on which both residences are located. He erected the residence at No. 811, now occupied by him, in the year 1915, and he erected the other residence in the year 1914. Very soon after said residences were completed he built…

2Cases cited10 opinions

  1. Williams v. HarmansonSupreme Court of Louisiana · 1889
  2. Ogborn v. Lower Terrebonne Refining & Mfg. Co.Supreme Court of Louisiana · 1911
  3. Vidrine v. VidrineLouisiana Court of Appeal · 1930
  4. De Graauw v. EleazarLouisiana Court of Appeal · 1945
  5. Fuller v. WashingtonLouisiana Court of Appeal · 1944

5 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by4 opinions

  1. Ogden v. BankstonSupreme Court of Louisiana · 1981
  2. Acadia-Vermilion Rice Irrigating Co. v. BroussardLouisiana Court of Appeal · 1965
  3. Efner v. KetteringhamSupreme Court of Louisiana · 1950
  4. Hale v. HulinLouisiana Court of Appeal · 1961

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API