Legal Opinion
Thomas v. SHINSEKI
District Court, District of Columbia
Decided September 25, 2009No. Civil Case 07-598 (RJL)Published
1Opinion of the Court
MEMORANDUM OPINION
RICHARD J. LEON, District Judge.
Before the Court is defendants’ Motion to Dismiss. Plaintiff Oscar Thomas (“Thomas” or plaintiff), proceeding pro se, opposes the motion. Because Thomas has failed to state any actionable claims, defendants’ motion must be GRANTED.
BACKGROUND
By now this Court is quite familiar with Thomas and the claims he seeks to pursue. Thomas is a retired Army veteran who has repeatedly sought benefit payments from the Department of Veterans Affairs (“VA”) and has already sued the VA once before. In 2002, Thomas filed a complaint against the Secretary of VA…
2Cases cited8 opinions
- Harlow v. FitzgeraldSupreme Court of the United States · 1982
- Pearson v. CallahanSupreme Court of the United States · 2009
- Lewis v. CaseySupreme Court of the United States · 1996
- United States v. SmithSupreme Court of the United States · 1991
- Ali v. District of ColumbiaCourt of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit · 2002
3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.