Legal Opinion

Temoyan v. Commissioner

United States Board of Tax Appeals

Decided June 5, 1929No. Docket No. 22239Published

Evidence found to be insufficient to establish the liability of petitioners as transferees, under section 280 of the Revenue Act of 1926, of assets of the taxpayer.

1Opinion of the Court

ANNIE TEMOYAN AND ARAM K. JERREHIAN, TRUSTEES, ESTATE OF MRS. HORMIG TEMOYAN, PETITIONER, v. COMMISSIONER OF INTERNAL REVENUE, RESPONDENT.

Temoyan v. Commissioner

Docket No. 22239.

United States Board of Tax Appeals

16 B.T.A. 923; 1929 BTA LEXIS 2492;

June 5, 1929, Promulgated

Evidence found to be insufficient to establish the liability of petitioners as transferees, under section 280 of the Revenue Act of 1926, of assets of the taxpayer.

Milton A. Kamsler, Esq., for the petitioners.

Bruce A. Low, Esq., for the respondent.

PHILLIPS

The Commissioner mailed to the petitioners as trustees of the estate of…

2Cases cited1 opinion

  1. Temoyan v. CommissionerUnited States Board of Tax Appeals · 1929

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API