Legal Opinion
Electronic Arts Inc. v. Hebrew University of Jerusalem
Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit
Decided May 7, 2004No. Nos. 03-15270, 03-15348Published
1Opinion of the Court
MEMORANDUM *
Electronic Arts, Inc. (“EA”) appeals the district court’s January 21, 2003, order denying its request for attorneys’ fees pur*631suant to the Astaire Celebrity Image Protection Act, Cal. Civ.Code § 3344.1. Hebrew University in Jerusalem (“HUJ”) cross appeals the district court’s denial of its request for an award of costs and argues that the district court lacked subject matter jurisdiction over the suit. We affirm the district court’s order with respect to subject matter jurisdiction and costs; reverse the order with respect to the availability of attorneys’ fees; and remand for a…
2Cases cited9 opinions
- Buckhannon Board & Care Home, Inc. v. West Virginia Dept. of Health and Human ResourcesSupreme Court of the United States · 2001
- Hal Roach Studios, Inc., a Delaware Corporation v. Richard Feiner and Company, Inc., a New York CorporationCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1990
- Societe De Conditionnement en Aluminium v. Hunter Engineering Co., Inc.Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1981
- Champion Produce, Inc. v. Ruby Robinson Co.Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 2003
- Margo v. WeissCourt of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 2000
4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.