Legal Opinion

Schmidt v. Musson

South Dakota Supreme Court

Decided May 21, 1909PublishedCited by 1 opinion

Hon. Joseph W. JONES, Judge. On reargument. Former opinion adhered to.

1Opinion of the CourtSmith, J.

This action is before this court 'on an' order granting a rehearing. The decision of the court is reported in 20 S. D. 389, 107 N. W. 367.

A careful consideration of the grounds presented in the petition for rehearing, and a full re-examination of the entire evidence contained in the abstract, make it clear that the decision by this court upon ithe former hearing is correct and should stand. We may add that the sixth finding of fact made by the trial court, which was, ip effect, that the first quitclaim deed was delivered to Floese “without any -condition whatever, except that the said Hoese…

2Cases cited1 opinion

  1. Schmidt v. MussonSouth Dakota Supreme Court · 1906

3Cited by1 opinion

  1. Bechtel v. Dakota National BankSouth Dakota Supreme Court · 1915

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API