Legal Opinion

Honolulu Rapid Transit Co. v. Wilder

Hawaii Supreme Court

Decided January 11, 1929No. 1848Published

1Per curiam

This is a petition for rehearing. It is based on five grounds, the first ground being that counsel neglected to call the court’s attention to the case of Rapid Transit Co. v. Assessor, 18 Haw. 15. This case was never-' theless considered by us before the original opinion was written. We did not think then nor do we now think it is opposed to the conclusion we reached. One of the other grounds is that we overlooked the committee report on Act 227, L. 1925, in Senate Journal 1925, p. 721. This report was not overlooked but was duly considered and found to be insufficient to justify a different…

2Cases cited2 opinions

  1. Bell's Gap Railroad v. PennsylvaniaSupreme Court of the United States · 1890
  2. In re Assessment of Income Taxes, Honolulu Rapid Transit & Land Co.Hawaii Supreme Court · 1906

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API