Legal Opinion

Stoutenburg v. Humphrey

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York

Decided July 1, 1896PublishedCited by 4 opinions

Appeal by the defendant, Egbert Humphrey, from a judgment of the County Court of Ulster, county in favor of the plaintiff, entered in the office of the clerk of the county of Ulster on the 20th day of December, 1895, affirming a judgment rendered by a justice of the peace of said county.

1Opinion of the Court

Parker, P. J.:

It appears from the justice’s return in this action that issue was joined on the 14th of May, 1895, and that by mutual consent the case was then adjourned to June 20, 1895. On such adjourned day the case was again adjourned by consent of both parties to June 28, 1895, at nine o’clock a. m. On such last adjourned day the plaintiff appeared at the hour and place of adjournment. The defendant did not appear. At the request of the plaintiff, and upon the statement of his attorney that the counsel of both parties so desired, the

*28case was again “ held open ” until July 15, 1895. There…

2Cases cited1 opinion

  1. Proudfit v. Henman & HenmanNew York Supreme Court · 1811

3Cited by4 opinions

  1. Moody v. Becker, New York County Courts1901
  2. Morris v. HaysAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1897
  3. William L. Mantha Co. v. Peter Pirsch & Sons Co.Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1928
  4. Steele v. Wells, New York County Courts1898

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API