Legal Opinion

Handy v. State

Supreme Court of Delaware

Decided July 24, 2002No. 183, 2001PublishedCited by 14 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

VEASEY, Chief Justice.

In this appeal from the Superior Court we consider whether the State may charge a defendant with multiple counts of first degree arson on the basis that the defendant set a single fire intending to harm multiple victims. We hold that a charge of multiple counts of first degree arson for multiple intended victims based on a single fire constitutes an unconstitutional multiplicity prohibited by the Double Jeopardy Clause.

Consonant with the protection against double jeopardy afforded by the United States Constitution, the touchstone for multiplicity is legislative intent.…

2Cases cited19 opinions

  1. Brown v. OhioSupreme Court of the United States · 1977
  2. Wainwright v. StateSupreme Court of Delaware · 1986
  3. State v. WestlingWashington Supreme Court · 2002
  4. State v. WestlingWashington Supreme Court · 2002
  5. Spielberg v. StateSupreme Court of Delaware · 1989

14 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by14 opinions

  1. Sisson v. StateSupreme Court of Delaware · 2006
  2. Spencer v. StateSupreme Court of Delaware · 2005
  3. Mills v. StateSupreme Court of Delaware · 2019
  4. Washington v. StateSupreme Court of Delaware · 2003
  5. Zugehoer v. StateSupreme Court of Delaware · 2009

9 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API