Legal Opinion
Rulli v. Fan Co.
Ohio Supreme Court
Decided September 10, 1997No. 1996-0249PublishedCited by 14 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
[This opinion has been published in Ohio Official Reports at 79 Ohio St.3d 374.] RULLI, APPELLANT, v. FAN COMPANY ET AL., APPELLEES. [Cite as Rulli v. Fan Co.,
1997-Ohio-380.] Civil procedure—Where meaning of terms of settlement agreement is disputed, or there is a dispute that contests the existence of a settlement agreement, trial court must conduct an evidentiary hearing prior to entering judgment. Where the meaning of terms of a settlement agreement is disputed, or where there is a dispute that contests the existence of a settlement agreement, a trial court must conduct an evidentiary…
2Cases cited7 opinions
- Alexander v. Buckeye Pipe Line Co.Ohio Supreme Court · 1978
- Shifrin v. Forest City Enterprises, Inc.Ohio Supreme Court · 1992
- Rulli v. Fan Co.Ohio Supreme Court · 1997
- Spercel v. Sterling Industries, Inc.Ohio Supreme Court · 1972
- Noroski v. FalletOhio Supreme Court · 1982
2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by14 opinions
- Brown v. Spitzer Chevrolet Co.Ohio Court of Appeals · 2012
- W.O.M. v. Willys-Overland Motors, Unpublished Decision (12-29-2006)Ohio Court of Appeals · 2006
- B.W. Rogers Co. v. Wells Bros., Inc.Ohio Court of Appeals · 2012
- Kingsbury v. Cornerstone Family Office, L.L.C.Ohio Court of Appeals · 2022
- M & G Automotive Serv., Inc. v. BouscherOhio Court of Appeals · 2014
9 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.