Legal Opinion

Vanier v. Ponsoldt

Supreme Court of Kansas

Decided May 22, 1992No. 66,276, 66,444PublishedCited by 37 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

The opinion of the court was delivered by

Herd, J.:

This is an action to foreclose a security agreement against which a counterclaim was asserted. Jerry D. Vanier, d/b/a Vanier, a resident, of Kansas, sold an Arabian stallion to William R. Ponsoldt, d/b/a Pegasus Ranch, and Pegasus Ranch, Inc., Florida residents, at an auction in Kentucky. Vanier brought this action against Ponsoldt for failing to make payments according to the note and purchase agreement. Ponsoldt filed a counterclaim alleging fraud in the conduct of the auction, misrepresentations as to the horse’s condition and qualities,…

2Cases cited27 opinions

  1. The Bremen v. Zapata Off-Shore Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1972
  2. Carnival Cruise Lines, Inc. v. ShuteSupreme Court of the United States · 1991
  3. Sun Oil Co. v. WortmanSupreme Court of the United States · 1988
  4. Leiker Ex Rel. Leiker v. GaffordSupreme Court of Kansas · 1989
  5. First Nat'l Bank of Olathe v. ClarkSupreme Court of Kansas · 1979

22 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by37 opinions

  1. Excell, Inc. v. Sterling Boiler & Mechanical, Inc.Court of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit · 1997
  2. Gilman v. Wheat, First Securities, Inc.Court of Appeals of Maryland · 1997
  3. State v. McClanahanSupreme Court of Kansas · 1996
  4. Flight Concepts Ltd. Partnership v. Boeing Co.District Court, D. Kansas · 1993
  5. Ary Jewelers, L.L.C. v. KrigelSupreme Court of Kansas · 2004

32 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API