Nelson v. Johnson
North Dakota Supreme Court
1DissentSandstrom, Justice
[¶ 38] I respectfully dissent.
[¶ 39] The majority suggests that the three-day notice and opportunity to pay before summary eviction is a mere formality. It is not. It was a required prerequisite to this eviction. Goodman Inv., Inc. v. Swanston Equipment Co., 299 N.W.2d 786, 789 (N.D.1980). In Goodman, this Court quoted favorably the South Dakota Supreme Court in Dakota Hot Springs Co. v. Young, 9 S.D. 577, 70 N.W. 842, 843 (1897):
No court, as far as our researches have extended, has held that without a demand of rent from the tenant in some form, a forfeiture could be predicated upon a…
2Cases cited4 opinions
- Mullane v. Central Hanover Bank & Trust Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1950
- Greene v. LindseySupreme Court of the United States · 1982
- Goodman Investment, Inc. v. Swanston Equipment Co.North Dakota Supreme Court · 1980
- Dakota Hot Springs Co. v. YoungSouth Dakota Supreme Court · 1897