Legal Opinion

Herder v. Garman

New Jersey Court of Chancery

Decided March 29, 1930PublishedCited by 2 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

The parties agreed to exchange properties. The contract was effected through a real estate agent with whom both properties were listed. The complainants seek a rescission on the ground of misrepresentation; the defendant counter-claims for specific performance. The real estate agent who negotiated the trade, Reiss, represented to the complainants, in response to an inquiry, that there were no colored families in the neighborhood of the defendant's property. In fact, six negro families were living in four houses in the same block on the adjoining street. The locality was residential; the house…

2Cases cited1 opinion

  1. Baron v. BuermannNew Jersey Court of Chancery · 1928

3Cited by2 opinions

  1. Navilio v. SicaNew Jersey Court of Chancery · 1933
  2. Pollino v. PollinoNew Jersey Superior Court Appellate Division · 1956

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API