Appleby v. Delaney
Supreme Court of the United States
1Opinion of the CourtChief Justice Taft
The relators base their writ upon the alleged impairment of their contract rights contained in the grant and covenants of their deeds by the plan, adopted in 1916, under‘the Act of 1871, by the Dock Department, and approved by the Sinking Fund trustees, the execution of which the Dock Commissioner is enforcing by a formal refusal to grant permission, as requested by the relators, to fill up their lots. The authority of the Dock Commissioner and the Sinking Fund trustees, under the Act of 1871, is such as to make the plan and the refusal equivalent to a statute of the State, and, assuming that…
2Cases cited8 opinions
- Walla Walla City v. Walla Walla Water Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1898
- New Orleans Waterworks Co. v. Louisiana Sugar Refining Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1888
- Zucht v. KingSupreme Court of the United States · 1922
- Williams v. BruffySupreme Court of the United States · 1878
- Duryee v. . Mayor, Etc., of N.Y.New York Court of Appeals · 1884
3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by11 opinions
- King Manufacturing Co. v. City Council of AugustaSupreme Court of the United States · 1928
- Davenport Osteopathic Hospital Ass'n v. Hospital Service, Inc.Supreme Court of Iowa · 1967
- Real Estate Listing Service, Inc. v. Connecticut Real Estate CommissionSupreme Court of Connecticut · 1979
- Fraternal Order of Police Youngstown Lodge No. 28 v. HunterOhio Court of Appeals · 1975
- SBoard of Immigration Appeals · 1962
6 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.