Legal Opinion

Goldfarb v. Schaeffer

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York

Decided January 12, 2016No. 16644 650173/14Published

1Opinion of the Court

Order, Supreme Court, New York County (Marcy S. Friedman, J.), entered October 7, 2014, which, to the extent appealed from as limited by the briefs, granted defendants’ motion to dismiss the first and second causes of action in the complaint, unanimously affirmed, without costs.

The complaint alleges that plaintiff “was responsible for introducing [defendant Richard] Schaeffer to [nonparty] LIQD,” that plaintiff “found the opportunity for Schaeffer,” that “[t]hrough [plaintiffl’s connections, Schaeffer was introduced to [nonparty Brian] Ferdinand,” the cofounder of LIQD, and that “[a]s payment…

2Cases cited4 opinions

  1. Freedman v. Chemical Construction Corp.New York Court of Appeals · 1977
  2. Dura v. Walker, Hart & Co.New York Court of Appeals · 1971
  3. Haskins v. Loeb Rhoades & Co.New York Court of Appeals · 1981
  4. Meyers Associates, L.P. v. Conolog Corp.Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 2009

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API