Legal Opinion

Hammer v. Hammer

Court of Appeals of South Carolina

Decided June 6, 2012No. 4980PublishedCited by 1 opinion

1Opinion of the CourtLockemy, J.

In this appeal, Howard Hammer (Appellant) argues the circuit court erred in dismissing his complaint for lack of subject matter jurisdiction. Appellant sought a declaratory-judgment and other relief in connection with a contract with Shirley Hammer (Respondent). Appellant contends: (1) Respondent failed to file a proper motion to dismiss pursuant to Rule 7(b), SCRCP; (2) the contract clearly demonstrated the parties’ intent that the family court not have exclusive jurisdiction over the contract; and (3) sections 20-3-690 and 63-3-530 of the South Carolina Code do not provide for exclusive…

2Cases cited3 opinions

  1. Moseley v. MosierSupreme Court of South Carolina · 1983
  2. Capital City Insurance v. BP Staff, Inc.Court of Appeals of South Carolina · 2009
  3. Terry v. LeeSupreme Court of South Carolina · 1992

3Cited by1 opinion

  1. Frank Rish, Sr. v. Kathy RishSupreme Court of South Carolina · 2024

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API