Legal Opinion

Bergman v. Guthrie

Supreme Court of Iowa

Decided October 13, 1893PublishedCited by 8 opinions

Appeal from Jasper District Court. — Hon. David Eyan, Judge. The plaintiffs, by the process of garnishment, seek to appropriate, as the property of their judgment debtor, certain money owing by the garnishees, and claimed by the intervenor. There was a trial by the court without a jury, and a judgment in favor of the intervenor. The plaintiffs appeal.

1Opinion of the Court

Eobinson, O. J.

On the ninth day of February, 1892, J. P. Bell and B. W.Blackwood were garnished,under a general execution issued from the office of the clerk of the district court of Jasper county, on a judgment in favor of the plaintiffs, and against the defendants G. S. Guthrie and others, as supposed debtors of said Guthrie. On the same day G. W. Harlan and Ed Donahey were likewise garnished under a general execution issued by the same clerk on another judgment in favor of the plaintiffs and against the defendants, as supposed debtors of said Guthrie. On the same day J. P, Bell and D. G.…

2Cited by8 opinions

  1. Hoyt v. ClemansSupreme Court of Iowa · 1914
  2. Farmers' State Bank of Alva v. KavanaughSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1924
  3. Barrett v. MartzahnSupreme Court of Iowa · 1919
  4. Korner v. McKirganSupreme Court of Iowa · 1926
  5. First Security Bank v. Zaring Farm & Livestock Co.Idaho Supreme Court · 1932

3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API