Legal Opinion

Giannetti v. Thomas

Massachusetts Appeals Court

Decided May 22, 1992No. 91-P-142PublishedCited by 4 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

When defendants’ Rottweiler dogs escaped from their property and ran unleashed in the plaintiffs’ neighborhood, the plaintiffs brought an action for civil contempt against the defendants in the Superior Court for violation of the terms of a preliminary injunction entered in a pending action. The injunction prohibited the defendants from allowing the dogs to leave their premises unless they were securely leashed. After a hearing, the judge found the defendants in contempt and imposed a prospective, coercive fine upon three of the defendants, payable to the Commonwealth. From the judgment of…

2Cases cited15 opinions

  1. United States v. United Mine Workers of AmericaSupreme Court of the United States · 1947
  2. Newell v. HintonMississippi Supreme Court · 1990
  3. G. & C. Merriam Co. v. Webster Dictionary Company, Inc.Court of Appeals for the First Circuit · 1980
  4. Darmetko v. Boston Housing AuthorityMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1979
  5. Root v. MacDonaldMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1927

10 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by4 opinions

  1. Demoulas v. Demoulas Super Markets, Inc.Massachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1997
  2. Katz v. KatzMassachusetts Appeals Court · 2002
  3. Ventresca v. Town Manager of BillericaMassachusetts Appeals Court · 2007
  4. Quill v. EresianMassachusetts Superior Court · 2000

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API