Legal Opinion

Martin v. State

Indiana Court of Appeals

Decided January 18, 1995No. 49A02-9308-CR-436PublishedCited by 1 opinion

1Opinion of the Court

OPINION ON REHEARING

FRIEDLANDER, Judge.

On September 6, 1994, this court affirmed John Martin’s conviction of three counts of battery, but remanded the cause for resen-tencing. See Martin v. State (1994), Ind.App., 638 N.E.2d 1349. The trial court had imposed consecutive sentences for the three battery convictions. At the original sentencing, the trial court stated that it was required to impose consecutive sentences because Martin was “on bond”, within the meaning of Ind.Code 35-50-1-2, for the first battery offense at the time he committed the second and third batteries. We remanded for…

2Cases cited1 opinion

  1. Martin v. StateIndiana Court of Appeals · 1994

3Cited by1 opinion

  1. Christmas v. StateIndiana Court of Appeals · 2004

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API