Legal Opinion

Schwartz v. Tanner

Utah Supreme Court

Decided March 8, 1978No. 14832 and 14844PublishedCited by 11 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

HALL, Justice:

Defendants appeal separately from a judgment based upon fraud involving the sale of a house.

Plaintiffs Schwartz, hereinafter referred to collectively as “Schwartz,” were the owners of a residence in Salt Lake County which was listed for sale. Schwartz was contacted by, and met with, defendant Hal-tom for two hours at the San Francisco Airport during which time a purchase agreement was negotiated pertaining to said residence. Haltom represented himself as the agent of Stan Tanner, 1 the father of defendant Michael S. Tanner. (Hereafter, they shall be referred to as “Stan” and…

2Cases cited4 opinions

  1. Pace v. ParrishUtah Supreme Court · 1952
  2. Charlton v. HackettUtah Supreme Court · 1961
  3. Jardine v. Brunswick CorporationUtah Supreme Court · 1967
  4. Bezner v. Continental Dry Cleaners, Inc.Utah Supreme Court · 1976

3Cited by11 opinions

  1. Von Hake v. ThomasUtah Supreme Court · 1985
  2. DeBry v. NobleUtah Supreme Court · 1995
  3. Sugarhouse Finance Co. v. AndersonUtah Supreme Court · 1980
  4. DeBry v. Cascade EnterprisesUtah Supreme Court · 1994
  5. Rawson v. ConoverUtah Supreme Court · 2001

6 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API