Legal Opinion
Johnson v. Katz
New York Court of Appeals
Decided June 10, 1986PublishedCited by 113 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
OPINION OF THE COURT
Memorandum.
The order of the Appellate Division should be affirmed, with costs.
Judicial review of the determination to discharge this probationary employee is limited to an inquiry as to whether the termination was made in bad faith. Evidence in the record supporting the conclusion that performance was unsatisfactory establishes that the discharge was made in good faith (Matter of King v Sapier, 47 AD2d 114, 116, affd on opn below 38 NY2d 960; see, Matter of York v McGuire, 99 AD2d 1023, affd 63 NY2d 760; Matter of Matsa v Wallach, 42 AD2d 1004, 1005, affd 34 NY2d 891).…
2Cases cited6 opinions
- York v. McGuireNew York Court of Appeals · 1984
- York v. McGuireAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1984
- King v. SapierAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1975
- King v. SapierNew York Court of Appeals · 1976
- Matsa v. WallachAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1973
1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by113 opinions
- Yonkers Racing Corp. v. City of YonkersCourt of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 1988
- Soto v. KoehlerAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1991
- Lane v. City of New YorkAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 2012
- Walsh v. New York State Thruway AuthorityAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 2005
- Kolmel v. City of New YorkAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 2011
108 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.