Blessing v. Camas Prairie Railroad Co.
Washington Supreme Court
1DissentSimpson, J.
(dissenting) — I am unable to agree that appellant was in any way negligent.
The only negligence charged either in the complaint or by the evidence is that appellant did not maintain a ditch along the side of its roadbed in order to stop soil from sliding or rocks from rolling upon its track. It must be borne in mind that appellant’s railway line runs through an arid country along the banks of the Snake river. But little moisture comes to this area, though there are occasional heavy rainfalls in the summertime and some snow during the winter months. Above the track are high hills covered with…
2Cases cited14 opinions
- Hubbell v. . City of YonkersNew York Court of Appeals · 1887
- Atkinson v. Goodrich Transportation Co.Wisconsin Supreme Court · 1884
- Hysell v. Swift & Co.Missouri Court of Appeals · 1899
- Garner v. Pacific Coast Coal Co.Washington Supreme Court · 1940
- Kennett v. FedericiWashington Supreme Court · 1939
9 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.