Legal Opinion

Pennsylvania Co. v. Purvis

Appellate Court of Illinois

Decided October 8, 1906No. Gen. No. 12,790PublishedCited by 3 opinions

Action in case for personal injuries. Appeal from the Superior Court of Cook county; the Hon. Arthur H. Frost, Judge, presiding. Heard in this court at the October term, 1905.

1Opinion of the CourtJustice Adams

Appellee was plaintiff and appellant defendant in the trial court and will be so referred to in this opinion.

Plaintiff claims to have been injured in a collision between two of the defendant’s trains, near Sharon, in the state of Pennsylvania, while a passenger on one of said trains. The facts are substantially as follows: The plaintiff in December, 1902, was in the employ of the defendant, in the city of Chicago, as a clerk, and then requested leave of absence for ten days and for transportation, which was granted, and a pass from Chicago to Brie, follows, was given to him: and return,…

2Cases cited7 opinions

  1. G., C. & S. F. R'y Co. v. McGownTexas Supreme Court · 1886
  2. Illinois Central Railroad v. ReadIllinois Supreme Court · 1865
  3. Louisville, New Albany & Chicago Railway Co. v. FaylorIndiana Supreme Court · 1890
  4. Berry v. City of ChicagoIllinois Supreme Court · 1901
  5. Watkins v. HackettSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1873

2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by3 opinions

  1. Fedor v. Mauwehu Council, Boy Scouts of America, Inc.Connecticut Superior Court · 1958
  2. Coburn v. Moline, East Moline & Watertown Railway Co.Appellate Court of Illinois · 1909
  3. Born v. Chicago City Railway Co.Appellate Court of Illinois · 1911

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API