State v. Larry
Court of Appeals of Washington
1Opinion of the CourtHunt, J.
Codefendants Clinton Larry and McQueen Varnes appeal their convictions for kidnapping, robbery, and attempted murder of a fast food restaurant manager. The codefendants were tried together. Larry argues that the trial court erred in admitting Varnes’ redacted confession. Varnes argues that the redacted statement unfairly excluded exculpatory portions of his confession, and that the prosecutor misstated the law during closing argument. Both argue that they should have had separate trials, that their respective sentences should have run concurrently, and that there was insufficient evidence of…
2Cases cited49 opinions
- Miranda v. ArizonaSupreme Court of the United States · 1966
- Bruton v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1968
- Pointer v. TexasSupreme Court of the United States · 1965
- Richardson v. MarshSupreme Court of the United States · 1987
- State v. GreenWashington Supreme Court · 1980
44 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by31 opinions
- State v. AsaeliCourt of Appeals of Washington · 2009
- State v. AsaeliCourt of Appeals of Washington · 2009
- State v. MedinaCourt of Appeals of Washington · 2002
- State v. LarryCourt of Appeals of Washington · 2001
- State v. FisherWashington Supreme Court · 2016
26 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.