Legal Opinion

Harbor Chevrolet Corp. v. MacHinists Local Union 1484

California Court of Appeal

Decided August 28, 1959No. Civ. 23371PublishedCited by 9 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtWhite, P. J.

Plaintiff, Harbor Chevrolet Corporation, hereinafter referred to as “Harbor,” brought the instant action against the Teamsters Union, Machinists Union and the Painters Union, alleging that on April 13, 1957, the defendant unions entered into an oral agreement with Frederick A. Potruch, attorney for Harbor, that said unions would not picket Harbor in consideration of its said attorney promising to refrain from acting as legal counsel for Freeman McKenzie Ford in connection with the latter’s dispute with said union; that said agreement not to picket was to remain in effect until a majority of…

2Cases cited7 opinions

  1. Sontag Chain Stores Co. v. Superior CourtCalifornia Supreme Court · 1941
  2. Grunwald-Marx, Inc. v. Los Angeles Joint BoardCalifornia Supreme Court · 1959
  3. Union Interchange, Inc. v. SavageCalifornia Supreme Court · 1959
  4. Brock v. Superior CourtCalifornia Supreme Court · 1938
  5. Isert v. RiecksCalifornia Supreme Court · 1925

2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by9 opinions

  1. Wind v. HerbertCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1960
  2. Socialist Workers 1974 California Campaign Committee v. BrownCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1975
  3. Paramount Pictures Corp. v. DavisCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1964
  4. New Tech Developments v. Bank of Nova ScotiaCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1987
  5. Christopher v. JonesCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1964

4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API