Duke Power Co. v. Somerset County Board of Taxation
Supreme Court of New Jersey
1Opinion of the Court
The opinion of the court was delivered by
Perskie, J.
The judgment under review is affirmed, for the reasons expressed in the opinion of Chief Justice Brogan for the Supreme Court.
Prosecutor assails the propriety of the inclusion of R. S. 54:3-20 in the “Revised Statutes” of 1937. That assault has far-reaching significance. It strikes at the very vitals of the entire revision and consolidation. The effect of the laws embraced in the revision and consolidation should be free from debate. In pursuance of that conviction, we have considered and determined the merits of the three-fold argument made…
2Cases cited2 opinions
- State v. GuidaSupreme Court of New Jersey · 1938
- Brower v. Township of FranklinSupreme Court of New Jersey · 1938
3Cited by7 opinions
- Goff v. HuntSupreme Court of New Jersey · 1951
- McGraw Electric Company v. Lewis & Smith Drug Co.Nebraska Supreme Court · 1955
- RH MacY & Co. Inc. v. DIRECTOR, DIV. OF TAX.New Jersey Superior Court Appellate Division · 1962
- Jersey City v. Division of Tax AppealsNew Jersey Superior Court Appellate Division · 1949
- Breuer v. MontvaleNew Jersey Superior Court Appellate Division · 1959
2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.