Legal Opinion

In re Biovail Corp. Securities Litigation

District Court, S.D. New York

Decided February 5, 2007No. 03 CV 8917 (RO)PublishedCited by 2 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

MEMORANDUM & ORDER

OWEN, District Judge.

At a hearing on October 13, 2006, the Court denied plaintiffs’ Motion To Unseal the Second Amended Class Action Complaint. Plaintiffs now move the Court to reconsider that denial.

To satisfy the standards governing motions for reconsideration, a movant must *72show that the Court has overlooked controlling decisions or factual matters that, had they been considered, might reasonably have altered the result. See Range Road Music, Inc. v. Music Sales Corp., 90 F.Supp.2d 390, 391-92 (S.D.N.Y.2000). A motion to reconsider is “not a motion to reargue those issues…

2Cases cited3 opinions

  1. United States v. AmodeoCourt of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 1995
  2. Range Road Music, Inc. v. Music Sales Corp.District Court, S.D. New York · 2000
  3. Houbigant, Inc. v. ACB Mercantile, Inc.District Court, S.D. New York · 1996

3Cited by2 opinions

  1. DAMIANA ROSARIO AS ADMINISTRATRIX FOR THE ESTATE OF JOSEFINA BENITEZ, ZION BRERETON, ALICIA LEARMONT, JAMES CHOI AND ANDREYA CRAWFORD, on behalf of themselves and all others similarly situated v. Valentino U.S.A., Inc.District Court, S.D. New York · 2024
  2. Richardson Foods Inc.United States Bankruptcy Court, S.D. New York · 2025

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API