Legal Opinion
F. Strauss & Son, Inc. v. Coverdale
Supreme Court of Louisiana
Decided May 22, 1944No. 37143PublishedCited by 7 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
HAMITER, Justice.
F. Strauss & Son, Inc., a Louisiana corporation and the plaintiff herein, is and has been for sometime engaged in the wholesale produce and liquor business at its domicile in Monroe, Ouachita Parish, Louisiana.
For the year 1942, its merchandise and stock in trade, based on an average inventory for 1941, was assessed for ad valorem taxation purposes by the tax assessor of Ouachita Parish at $76,860. But on a review of the assessment the Louisiana Tax Commission ordered an increase of $36,-000, thus raising it to the total of $112,860, this added amount representing the cost of…
2Cases cited10 opinions
- M'culloch v. State of MarylandSupreme Court of the United States · 1819
- Weston and Others v. the City Council of CharlestonSupreme Court of the United States · 1829
- Lash's Products Co. v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1929
- Consolidated Distributors Inc. v. City of AtlantaSupreme Court of Georgia · 1942
- State v. Wilson & Co.Supreme Court of Louisiana · 1934
5 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by7 opinions
- Robert Williams & Co. v. State Tax Commission of MissouriSupreme Court of Missouri · 1973
- Pierce & Hebner, Inc. v. State Tax CommissionCourt of Appeals of Maryland · 1950
- Cass v. Colorado Beverage Co.Supreme Court of Colorado · 1950
- Lucky Lager Brewing Co. v. CommissionerUnited States Tax Court · 1956
- Dade County v. Atlantic Liquor Co.Supreme Court of Florida · 1970
2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.