Legal Opinion

Pankow v. Swift & Co.

Supreme Court of New Jersey

Decided November 30, 1909Published

On error to the Hudson Circuit.

1Opinion of the Court

The opinion of the court was delivered by

Mintuen, J.

The plaintiff in error was nonsuited at the Hudson Circuit upon the following state of facts:

He was employed by the defendant to fill a lard and fat machine, which was operated in defendant’s factory for the purpose of cutting and grinding lard. The lard was placed in a funnel-shaped device at the top of the machine, and was led down to the bottom of the funnel, where a revolving shaft cut the lard and carried it out into a vat.

*533On the day before the accident occurred the machine indicated a disarrangement by the looseness of the cogs, which…

2Cases cited5 opinions

  1. Bien v. UngerSupreme Court of New Jersey · 1900
  2. Andrecsik v. New Jersey Tube Co.Supreme Court of New Jersey · 1906
  3. Cicalese v. Lehigh Valley RailroadSupreme Court of New Jersey · 1908
  4. Spencer v. HainesSupreme Court of New Jersey · 1906
  5. Kalker v. HeddenSupreme Court of New Jersey · 1905

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API