Legal Opinion

Pulliam & Payne v. Withers

Court of Appeals of Kentucky

Decided May 3, 1839PublishedCited by 9 opinions

Pet. & Sum. From the Circuit Court eor Anderson County.

1Opinion of the Court

Judge Ewing

delivered the opinion of the Court.

Withers sued out a summons on a petition, against Pulliam and Payne, on a noté under seal, purporting to be executed by the defendants, in the following form:—

“ On the first day of March next, I promise to pay u Nathaniel G. Thomas one hundred and twenty dol*99u lars, for value received of him, this 26th day of September, 1833.”

Two persons,having given a note,. in the body of which they were named as promis sprs— the addition afterwards, of a third signature, with a corresponding change in the body, with out the consent of the original signers, was…

2Cited by9 opinions

  1. Chappell v. SpencerNew York Supreme Court · 1857
  2. Shipp's Adm'r v. Suggett's Adm'rCourt of Appeals of Kentucky · 1848
  3. Hall's Adm'x v. McHenrySupreme Court of Iowa · 1865
  4. Singleton v. McQuerryCourt of Appeals of Kentucky · 1887
  5. Randall v. SimmonsOregon Supreme Court · 1902

4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API