Legal Opinion
Hill v. THE STATE
Court of Appeals of Georgia
Decided June 18, 1982No. 63942PublishedCited by 8 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
Quillian, Chief Judge.
Defendant appeals his conviction and sentence for driving after being declared a habitual violator. Held:
1. The defendant was served with notice that he was declared a habitual violator while he was being tried on an unrelated offense. It is contended that such service was insufficient because defendant was immune from service of process while in attendance at a trial under Code Ann. § 38-1506 and Ausbon v. Ausbon, 131 Ga. App. 530 (206 SE2d 546).
We do not agree. Code Ann. § 38-1506 pertains to civil process and we find that service of a notice of revocation under Code…
2Cases cited9 opinions
- Snyder v. MassachusettsSupreme Court of the United States · 1934
- Baldasar v. IllinoisSupreme Court of the United States · 1980
- Harrell v. StateSupreme Court of Georgia · 1978
- Smith v. StateSupreme Court of Georgia · 1982
- Hammond v. StateCourt of Appeals of Georgia · 1976
4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by8 opinions
- Gann v. StateCourt of Appeals of Georgia · 1989
- Glass v. StateCourt of Appeals of Georgia · 1987
- Johnson v. StateCourt of Appeals of Georgia · 1998
- Love v. HardisonCourt of Appeals of Georgia · 1983
- Hardison v. BookerCourt of Appeals of Georgia · 1986
3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.