Legal Opinion

Milam v. Norwich Union Indemnity Co.

West Virginia Supreme Court

Decided September 17, 1929No. 6476PublishedCited by 18 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

Hatohee, Judge:

A health and accident policy issued by defendant to W. K. Milam, a coal miner, agreed to pay him a certain snm per month in case he was wholly and continnonsly disabled by reason of “sickness contracted during the term of the policy.” He was asked no questions and made no statement relative to his health when the policy was issued. He had been under medical treatment for Bright’s Disease for a year or so before that time. It seems that this malady is incurable, but no element of bad faith is charged to Milam in obtaining the policy. He had purchased an automobile on the…

2Cases cited4 opinions

  1. Cohen v. North American Life & Casualty Co.Supreme Court of Minnesota · 1921
  2. Tucker v. Colonial Fire InsuranceWest Virginia Supreme Court · 1905
  3. Cook v. Citizens Insurance Co.West Virginia Supreme Court · 1928
  4. Doody v. DavieCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1926

3Cited by18 opinions

  1. Murray Hospital v. AngroveMontana Supreme Court · 1932
  2. Southards v. Central Plains InsuranceSupreme Court of Kansas · 1968
  3. Christopher v. United States Life InsuranceWest Virginia Supreme Court · 1960
  4. American Casualty & Life Co. v. ButlerCourt of Appeals of Texas · 1948
  5. National Casualty Co. v. HudsonAlabama Court of Appeals · 1945

13 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API